Checking socket server status...

Back to Blog
HiringEngineering ManagementCulture

How to Conduct Technical Interviews Without Automated Testing

LiveCodeShare
Apr 14, 2026
7 min read
How to Conduct Technical Interviews Without Automated Testing

Over the last decade, the technology industry has experienced a massive pushback against automated, high-pressure algorithmic vetting platforms (colloquially known as "Leetcode-style" or "HackerRank-style" interviews). While these automated systems technically parse out engineers who haven't memorized binary tree inversions, they overwhelmingly fail to measure actual on-the-job software engineering capabilities.

How do you conduct technical interviews effectively?
Modern technical interviews are shifting away from automated test suites toward open-ended, synchronized pair-programming environments. In this model, the interviewer and candidate collaboratively model a real-world system using a shared text buffer, evaluating communication alongside technical syntax.

The case against automated testing

When you force a senior engineering candidate into an environment that auto-fails them based on a missed semi-colon or a highly specific time-complexity edge case, you lose visibility into the metrics that actually matter. You lose visibility into how they handle ambiguous abstractions, how they document their thought processes, and how they communicate with peers under stress.

Real-world engineering almost never involves writing complex standard library parsers from scratch under a 30-minute ticking clock in total isolation. It involves deep architectural planning, looking up correct parameters in documentation, and clarifying business constraints with product managers.

Note: Strict, executable interview sandboxes actively eliminate organic workflows. If your interview does not resemble the day-to-day work of the job, your hiring signals are intrinsically flawed.

The open sandbox approach

If you utilize non-executable environments for your remote coding interviews—such as a synchronized editor like LiveCodeShare—you fundamentally shift the emphasis from "compilation output" to "logical structure."

Instead of demanding executable answers, provide the candidate with a shared document. Ask them to design the API layer for a new ride-sharing application. You will immediately observe how they structure their classes, how defensively they name their functions, and whether they actively solicit feedback before diving into the weeds.

Evaluating communication over compilation

Because LiveCodeShare offers completely latency-free WebSocket synchronization, it functions exactly like a digital whiteboard, except with full syntax highlighting for over 50 languages. If a candidate forgets how to initialize a specific Hash Map in Java, the interviewer can simply drop their cursor on line 12 and type it out for them.

This transforms the interview from an aggressive interrogation into an active collaborative exercise. It yields an infinitely higher signal-to-noise ratio regarding their actual team-fit and technical competency compared to any automated system on the market.